|
|
Statistics conceptual questions
Hi all
I took a course subject in basic statistics but its been so long ago I find that I have mixed up or forgotten some of the concepts so I hope someone here can help me refresh my memory.
1) Probability starts from 0 to 1, you can have any range of numbers but they cannot exceed 1 or be less than 0 (true/false)
2) If you have a probability of greater than 0, regardless how small that probability is it will occur given enough time (say infinite amount of time)
3) I was intrigued by a poster with a list of quot;factsquot; that supports creationism, it mention someone about Borel and his law and something about infinite monkeys. I did my google but I am still not a 100% sure of what I am reading so I am simplifying my statements here
a) Borel law simply states that if you have a small probability, the probability of it occuring is almost negligible
b) If you have a monkey typing for infinity, then the chance of the monkey typing out Hamlet is almost certain
Thanks!
Originally Posted by Ukitake Jyuushirou Hi all
I took a course subject in basic statistics but its been so long ago I find that I have mixed up or forgotten some of the concepts so I hope someone here can help me refresh my memory.
1) Probability starts from 0 to 1, you can have any range of numbers but they cannot exceed 1 or be less than 0 (true/false) I'm not sure what you mean by quot;any range of numbersquot; but, yes, a quot;probabilityquot; cannot be less than 0 nor larger than 1.
2) If you have a probability of greater than 0, regardless how small that probability is it will occur given enough time (say infinite amount of time) No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability.
3) I was intrigued by a poster with a list of quot;factsquot; that supports creationism, it mention someone about Borel and his law and something about infinite monkeys. I did my google but I am still not a 100% sure of what I am reading so I am simplifying my statements here
a) Borel law simply states that if you have a small probability, the probability of it occuring is almost negligible Actually, quot;Borel's Lawquot; does not say that- that's just directly from the definition of probability. quot;Borel's Lawquot; (not really a law in the mathematical sense, just a quot;rule of thumbquot;) says that you can find a quot;cut offquot; so that events with probability less than that cut off number can't reallistically happen under whatever conditons you have set (length of time you are letting the quot;experimentquot; run, etc.). Of course, that quot;cut offquot; will depend upon the additional conditions you have set.
b) If you have a monkey typing for infinity, then the chance of the monkey typing out Hamlet is almost certain Theoretically yes. But other than quot;theoreticallyquot; the situaltion is meaningless.
Thanks! Probably one of the websites you looked at was this:
faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html
which points out that the quot;creationistquot; argument based on quot;Borel's Lawquot; tend to ignore the non-random determinants in evolution- exactly the things that Darwin's argument was based on. Creationists typically see no intermediate position between quot;determined by Godquot; and quot;completely randomquot;.
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy I'm not sure what you mean by quot;any range of numbersquot; but, yes, a quot;probabilityquot; cannot be less than 0 nor larger than 1.
I meant any range of numbers between 0 and 1
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability.
so if say the probability of a chimpanzee typing out the whole script of Hamlet is 0.000000000000000000000001 (you get the idea) but if the chimp has infinity time to do it, it WILL NEVER occur?
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy Probably one of the websites you looked at was this:
faqs/abioprob/borelfaq.html
which points out that the quot;creationistquot; argument based on quot;Borel's Lawquot; tend to ignore the non-random determinants in evolution- exactly the things that Darwin's argument was based on. Creationists typically see no intermediate position between quot;determined by Godquot; and quot;completely randomquot;.
What do you mean by non random determinants?
Thanks for your help, much appreciated!
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy
No, that is not true. You can never say something will happen in probability. Originally Posted by Ukitake Jyuushirou so if say the probability of a chimpanzee typing out the whole script of Hamlet is 0.000000000000000000000001 (you get the idea) but if the chimp has infinity time to do it, it WILL NEVER occur? No, I didn't say anything like that! Are you thinking that the only possibllities are quot;must happenquot; and quot;will never happenquot;? quot robablequot; and quot;possiblequot; are quite different things. Given each letter equally likely, it is possible that, in an infinite string of letters you get quot;aaaaaa...quot;, all a's. On the other hand, it is also possible that the letter quot;aquot; will never occur. Neither one quot;mustquot; happen.
What do you mean by non random determinants?
Thanks for your help, much appreciated! I mean, of course, natural selection which will weed out fatal mutations.
Originally Posted by HallsofIvy No, I didn't say anything like that! Are you thinking that the only possibllities are quot;must happenquot; and quot;will never happenquot;? quot robablequot; and quot;possiblequot; are quite different things. Given each letter equally likely, it is possible that, in an infinite string of letters you get quot;aaaaaa...quot;, all a's. On the other hand, it is also possible that the letter quot;aquot; will never occur. Neither one quot;mustquot; happen.
In statistical terms, how would u define probable and possible? |
|